happydalek: (Default)
 This review brought to you by: 

The letter L

The number 3

And several beers.

Yeah, I'm about a week late on this one, but SO WAT.  Lemme tell yous guys what I thought.  

Spoilers, obviously. )
happydalek: (Default)
Hugh Jackman looked very much more like Wolverine in this than I think he did in any of the X-Men movies.  Age has allowed him to bulk up rather nicely.  He was definitely too slender in the early X-Men movies to sell it.  Plus, he has much better hair now.  None of that iffy attempt to give him the comic book Wolverine...hair...ridge...thing.  But those muttonchops need to make a fashion comeback, guys. 

tl;dr version: hugh jackman is hot but the movie...not so much. Mild spoilers included. )
happydalek: (didn't see that coming)
I do!!  Er, rather, I DID!  Last night!  Exclamation point!  Going into the theatre, there was a guy dressed in an awesome Rorschach costume, and after it was over, it turned out he had a couple friends with him going as the Comedian, and Mr. Manhattan (with clothes on, fortunately!).  I didn't get any pictures, sadly.  But it was pretty neat.  The theatre was packed, too, and when it was over there was applause.  Haven't been to too many movies that got applause. 

Disclaimer: I read and really enjoyed The Watchmen graphic novel, so this review is biased in that direction.  Can't help it, sorry.

So, what did I think of it?  Well, in a nutshell, it proves that an excellent comic book does not an excellent movie make.  Watchmen isn't a bad movie, merely a pretty good one.  It's two hour and 40 minute running time flew by and the narrative was engaging.  But this was a 12-issue series they made into a single show.  The Watchmen was a story crafted to take advantage of the comic medium, not the film medium, and there was simply no way to adapt it without losing some of the depth and complexity that made it such a compelling story.

Click for a more detailed, but SPOILER FREE review. )
happydalek: (fanfic time)
Or, bookish post!  Where I blog about books!  Books I've actually read! 

In order to recover from the woe-riffic emotional BSoD (Blue Screen of Death) I suffered this week, I lost myself in a couple of books that I had started reading eons ago and forgot to finish.  The first is called Hominids, by Robert J. Sawyer. 

An epic mashup of Neanderthals and Causality! )

Also, I read James Blish's Spock Must Die (1970), the first-ever original Star Trek novel published.  *puts on beta hat and ranty pants* )

But getting back to the title of this post, I've now started reading The Mummy, or Ramses the Damned (1989), by the one-and-only Anne Rice (or, She-Who-Writes-Fangirl-Bait-and-Then-Forbids-Them-to-Write-Fanfic).  I've never read any of her other works (but Interview with a Vampire was a cool movie), and the vampire thing is getting so overplayed lately that I was eager to sink my teeth into a different kind of Undead-Guy tale. 

It's a 400-pager of which I am 70 pages in, and I don't know if I'm going to make it, you guys.  I can't tell if Rice is deliberately trying to be pulpy and cliche, or if she's just not that good of a writer (I suspect a bit of both), because the mummy is barely out of his wrappings (quite literally) and already the lead heroine is swooning over Teh Hawtness and Teh Sexxy that is Ramses the Damned.  And that line in the title is a direct quote, from page 69, and I just had to share it because it's lolarious.  

Any bookish thoughts about these selected books, or any suggestions for my reading list would be tremendously welcome!

happydalek: (please)
Went with a friend to see this sure-to-be-awful remake of The Day The Earth Stood Still last night, and guess what?  It was pretty awful.  Reading reviews for this flick, it seems the critical reception has been surprisingly uniform, and pretty on the mark.  Basically, the only thing this movie did right was cast Keanu Reeves as the alien.  Everything else about it (including the very fact of its existence) is just wrong.  The very message of the original film was changed and distorted. 

In the original, Klaatu was an utter pacifist.  True, he had Gort, his mighty robot, but even Gort was mostly authorized only to eliminate weapons, not hurt people.  Klaatu was a nice guy, even.  Warm and friendly, in his reserved way.  Keanu's Klaatu (I should start a poll on which name is the more strange, hehe) is cold and strange and vaguely untrustworthy (which actually is a better change, in my view.  One of the things that always bugged me about the original was what a normal human Klaatu seemed to be.  At least Keanu brings some genuine alienness to the part).  And he's a murderer.  The original Klaatu put the fear of god in people without harming a hair on anyone's head.  This one triggers the friggin' apocalypse.  From this perspective, I wish the movie had been billed as a sequel instead of a remake.  It wouldn't have made it any less ridiculous to sit through, but at least it would have made a bit more sense.  
happydalek: (spock)
Anyone remember this little gem from the first season of Star Trek, the original series?  More to the point, does anyone actually know what the heck was going on during this episode?  After it ended, I felt like somebody had just spent the last 50 minutes pouring thick sludge into my head and then hit me with a heavy, blunt object.  Uugh.  The lack of continuity with Lazarus' beard was especially grating, as if the production team realized that the episode was crap and deliberately decided to make it look as crap as possible.  Spock and Kirk seemed awfully underwhelmed at the prospect of the whole universe being destroyed, but Robert Brown did an excellent job at acting completely, inexplicably bonkers.  Or maybe he wasn't given any direction at all and was just reacting to the source material?  I have no idea how Kirk and Spock were able to figure any of this out before sane Lazarus' infodump in the last five minutes.  What a terrible episode.  Blecch.
happydalek: (please)
A few months ago, I started collecting and reading the Legacy of the Force, a 9-book series written variously by three authors, and starring the now all-growed-up Solo Twins.  I started reading it because I had heard people say that it was a good story.  Well, those people lied.  And as much as I'd like to become Ranty McRanty-pants about why, I found a review of the series that pretty much sums up everything I wanted to say (There are spoilers; though I don't like to call them that because it implies I actually cared about what happened in the story.  Frankly, I don't even think the authors did) .  Although I'm only a third of the way through the sixth book, Inferno, I'm finished with the series.  It pains me to see the Galaxy Far, Far Away reduced to this kind of recycled drivel. 

On the up side, I discovered that Timothy Zahn wrote a Thrawn duology, so I'm looking forward to tackling those, next. 

Also, if you haven't played Lego Star Wars, you MUST.   
happydalek: (didn't see that coming)
Huh.  That was a hell of a thing.

Thanks to a wonderfully generous friend of mine, I am now caught up with Series Four.  I pulled a marathon of episodes 10-13 (not having a job does have its occasional upside) this morning.  I love my geek friends.  SO MUCH. 

happydalek: (Default)
Meh. 



But Moff, I have certain expectations from you, and this time, you rather failed.  Which isn't a terrible thing.  I'd have started getting suspicious that you were some kind of Script God or android if you didn't pen a mediocre episode now and then. 
happydalek: (sigh)
Today, Invincible, the last of the 9-book series, Legacy of the Force came out, in which we presumably will see the defeat of Darth Caedus, Dark Lord of the Sith
[spoiler] )
.  Today is also the day I took all my graduation gift money to the bank.  Saving $50 to "congratulate" myself, I went to the local Borders.  But, surprise! I didn't purchase Invincible, for two reasons: a) it's in hardback, which means it's a billion times more expensive than a paperback, and b) I actually haven't read any of the LotF novels and figured that skipping right to the end would be both cheating, and probably a wasted experience because of all the backstory I'd have missed.  So instead, I purchased the first three novels of the series, Betrayal, Bloodlines and Tempest.  Then I went to the local park, sat down on a sunny bench, and started reading Betrayal. 

happydalek: (brain)
Yikes, two posts in one day!  Can you tell I have just graduated from school, quit my job and spent my whole day playing around on the internet?

happydalek: (Default)
I am really, really enjoying it.  Really!  Donna has got to be the best thing that has ever happened to Doctor Who since the show came back in 2005.  The episodes look fantastic, we've had a lovely sprinkling of history and space, mysterious references to current events (the disappearing bees), aliens who are not evil (the Ood and Adipose), a companion who isn't in love with the Doctor actually debates and argues with the Doctor and isn't wrong.  It really feels like the show is finally hitting its stride.  But is it just me, or does seem as if the storylines have gotten very SJA this season?  I almost want to think that it's being done as a deliberate compensation for having an "older" companion.  (But I love SJA, so this isn't necessarily a problem for me.)

happydalek: (dressing gown)
I figured, "so, heck, why not do a reaction post, too?"  Just about everybody else has. 

What do mean, "lemming?"  And no, I have no intention of running off a cliff.  That'd just be silly. 


I think that's mostly it.  Not great, but not a complete waste.  I've been reading a lot of very disappointed reaction posts lately, so I'd just like to point out that I've always loved Doctor Who not so much for what it is, but for what it could be.  I think Rusty and Co. made a huge mistake by making the Doctor/Companion relationship romantic, and it's clear Rusty is running out of original ideas.  But this is a show that has change and renewal built into its format.  Experimentation is good.  It doesn't always succeed, but you're sure to get crummy, stale product if you don't try in the first place. 
happydalek: (Default)
Took myself to a matinee showing.  Historical dramas normally aren't my cuppa, but I like Natalie Portman, and the soap opera that was the life of Henry VIII tickles my voyeuristic fancy.  Based on prior reviews I wasn't expecting to be super impressed, and in fact, I wasn't. 

happydalek: (Default)
Finished it!  Bam!  Haha!

And managed it spoiler-free, too! 

happydalek: (please)
Russell T. Davies' mega series three wrapup was, in the words of the other Captain Jack, just "maddeningly unhelpful."  
happydalek: (Default)
Crack.  That's what it was.  Total crack.  Whatever RTD was on when he wrote this, he evidently slipped some to John Simm before each take.  I was inches away from literally slapping my hands over my ears and going "Lalalalalalalala!"  at the whole thing.  Yet, like driving past a terrible roadside accident, I couldn't tear my eyes away from it. 

      

42

May. 21st, 2007 04:00 pm
happydalek: (didn't see that coming)
Okay, so I finally got around to watching Chris Chibnall's Doctor Who episode, and frankly, after the mess he made of Torchwood, I was not expecting much.  Considering that, I have to say "42" turned out to be not all that bad, provided it was basically a rerun of last series' "The Impossible Planet / The Satan Pit" two-parter. 

Profile

happydalek: (Default)
happydalek

August 2012

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678910 11
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 20th, 2025 04:18 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios